Optimizing LLM Inference for Scale

Deploying large language models at scale is less about raw model capability and more about how efficiently they run in production. Inference is the real bottleneck—the point where latency, throughput, and cost collide with user expectations.

By treating inference as a core competency, teams can deliver AI products that are fast, reliable, and cost-efficient, while meeting privacy and scalability needs. The path there requires careful choices in model selection, infrastructure, and optimization techniques.

Main Story

When building new AI products, starting with the most capable model available removes uncertainty about performance. This lets teams focus on product flow and user experience before making trade-offs on cost or specialization.

"Inference is really where a lot of the value is… if you can't run your models in production… the rest of it kind of doesn't matter." — Software Huddle

Evaluation should be tied directly to the product’s success criteria. That means crafting test datasets and metrics that reflect real user needs. In some cases, an “LLM-as-judge” approach can scale the evaluation process, while domain-specific metrics—like breaking down transcription errors—help pinpoint weak spots.

Cost efficiency depends on total cost of ownership, not just per-token pricing. Shared inference endpoints are ideal for low volumes, but once traffic can saturate a GPU, dedicated infrastructure often wins—bringing predictability, privacy, and customization.

Fine-tuning works best for adjusting model behavior rather than adding new knowledge. It should follow after prompt engineering and retrieval-augmented generation, and is especially valuable for adding capabilities like function calling or boosting performance in specialized contexts.

Compound AI architectures—where multiple models or types of models work together—can blend general-purpose reasoning with domain-specific precision. This might mean chaining models in a pipeline, layering business logic between inference steps, or pairing LLMs with traditional ML for filtering and scoring.

Technical Considerations

Inference performance hinges on two phases:

Prefill: GPU compute-bound, affected by prompt length
Token generation: GPU memory bandwidth-bound, affected by output length

Different bottlenecks require different levers. High-performance inference engines such as TensorRT-LLM compile execution into optimized CUDA instructions. Quantization—reducing numerical precision from fp16 to fp8—lightens memory bandwidth requirements with minimal quality loss. Speculative decoding speeds generation by having a smaller model draft tokens for a larger one to verify.

Hardware selection matters. Hopper-generation GPUs (H100, H200) excel with large models and advanced quantization formats. Older GPUs (L4, A10, T4) fit smaller models or alternative modalities. Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) partitioning allows high-end GPUs to be split for smaller workloads, improving utilization.

Network and infrastructure tuning can be as critical as model-level optimization. Locating GPUs closer to users cuts latency. Reducing inter-model network hops in compound systems, managing cold starts, and optimizing connection handling can all help meet strict SLAs.

Business Impact & Strategy

From a leadership perspective, inference optimization directly affects time-to-value, operating margins, and product viability. Moving to dedicated inference once traffic justifies it is akin to “buying tokens in bulk,” lowering unit costs while improving service consistency.

Clear evaluation criteria become strategic guardrails. They allow teams to make data-backed decisions on model swaps, fine-tuning investments, or architectural changes. Without them, optimization risks chasing marginal gains that don’t translate into user impact.

Organizationally, inference optimization spans engineering, product, and operations. It demands cross-functional coordination—aligning infra teams on GPU allocation, product managers on quality thresholds, and finance teams on cost models.

Vendor risk and privacy considerations also play a role. Dedicated deployments reduce “noisy neighbor” interference and improve control over data handling, which can be vital for regulated industries.

Key Insights

Start with the largest feasible model during prototyping to remove performance uncertainty
Evaluate against product-specific datasets and metrics, not generic benchmarks
Cost efficiency emerges when GPU utilization is high enough for dedicated deployments
Fine-tuning is for behavior shaping, not knowledge injection—use after prompt and retrieval optimization
Compound AI systems can combine versatility with specialization
Prefill and generation phases have distinct bottlenecks—optimize accordingly
Hardware, inference engine, quantization, and network design all contribute to latency and throughput gains

Why It Matters

Inference optimization is where AI ambitions meet operational reality. For technical leaders, it’s the difference between a promising prototype and a market-ready product. For business leaders, it’s a lever to control costs, improve user satisfaction, and scale without degrading quality.

As model capabilities continue to evolve, the competitive edge will come from how efficiently those capabilities are delivered to users—not just from the models themselves.

Actionable Playbook

Prototype with maximum capability: Begin with the largest model available to validate product flows; success is a clear understanding of functional needs before scaling down
Define precise evals: Create targeted test sets and metrics tied to user outcomes; success is consistent, automated pass/fail assessment
Switch to dedicated inference when ready: Migrate from shared endpoints once GPU saturation is sustainable; success is reduced latency variance and lower unit cost
Layer optimizations strategically: Apply inference engine, quantization, and speculative decoding in sequence; success is measurable speed gains without quality loss
Align hardware to workload: Match GPU architecture and memory to model size; success is high utilization and stable performance

Conclusion

Optimizing inference is a strategic discipline, blending engineering precision with business pragmatism. Teams that invest in it early can deliver AI products that are fast, affordable, and ready to scale.

Inspired by: Deep Dive into Inference Optimization for LLMs with Philip Kiely — Software Huddle; 20241105
Dive deeper into the content →
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0BdmevNhuc